Cabinet approves discretionary powers guide
Cabinet has approved a new policy guide to regulate government officials’ exercise of discretionary powers. The decision was made during a meeting on May 22, marking another step towards enhancing governance and transparency in the territory.
Premier Dr Natalio Wheatley highlighted the necessity for such a guide, citing recommendations from the Commission of Inquiry (COI) report.
Dr Wheatley agreed that ministers need more guidelines and more limitations to exercise their power. “One of the challenges that [COI Commissioner] Sir Gary Hickenbottom identified is that ministers exercise open-ended discretion, which means they were not the appropriate limits on the powers exercised by ministers,” the Premier said.
He added: “That was revealed through how we issued grants and perhaps how you rejected a tender process and did attend the waiver or even as it pertains to immigration and belonger status and how those statuses were granted.
The policy’s approval follows a thorough review by Anthea Smith, who was tasked with drafting the guide. Smith’s involvement underscores the importance of legal expertise in shaping policies that prevent abuse of power and ensure accountability.
Smith’s review concluded that while most discretionary powers granted to elected officials are necessary and appropriate, certain provisions could potentially be challenged constitutionally.
For example, the provision in the Social Security (Employment Injury Benefits) Regulations allowing the Minister to remove tribunal members without reason compromises the tribunal’s independence. Similarly, the Public Finance Management Regulations enable the Cabinet to exercise discretion over the Central Tenders Board’s recommendations without clear criteria, risking judicial review.
The review recommended that clearer guidelines and supplemental legislation be introduced to ensure that discretionary powers are exercised by good governance principles. This includes specifying the purpose of discretionary powers and establishing criteria for their exercise to prevent misuse and ensure accountability.
In the meantime, Cabinet mandated the Premier’s Office to develop an implementation plan for the guide, including training for various ministries and departments. Additionally, the policy will be reviewed after two years, potentially leading to the enactment of the proposed Administrative Justice (Judicial Review) Bill.
Copyright 2024 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.
Here are three of many Examples..
1. Cabinet should not have the Final say on who
should be granted Crown Lands.
2. Cabinet should not be the only ones deciding
who should be allowed to sit or stand on
Boards.
3. Cabinet should not have the final say on who is
given Residency nor Belongers status.
Remember what almost happen last time?
We all know nothing will change. Nepotism and corruption are a cultural norm
And that is indicative of the whole world, not just Tola. Let’s make that clear while painting with a scandulous brushes.
Kept in smallest room in the house for emergencies only.
Justifying evil and injustice because a next nation does it do not make it right .
So because Europe enslaved Africans that give America the right to do so?
Be careful !
My child did wrong , somebody elses child does the same thing is there justification in giving a pass to wrong doers ?
We are now in a dark place , morality is down the drain
Evil and discrimination is justified .
The Master do not like ugly as my grandmother will say . We need to stop did ting !!
Going back down the same slippery slope…
As if they didn’t have enough discretionary powers already… Just give them a bigger toe hold, Will this poppy show ever end!