BVI News

I will not oppose the court’s ruling, Willock must pay — Vanterpool

Opposition legislator, Mark Vanterpool.

Opposition legislator with the National Democratic Party, Mark Vanterpool, said he will not be voting to exempt Speaker Julian Willock from paying his (Willock’s) legal fees when the select parliamentary committee meets to assess the matter.

In an interview on ZBVI today, Vanterpool said while he agreed to be one of three members to sit on the committee, he does not support any action that defies a court order.

And he believes Premier Andrew Fahie’s motion to form the committee did just that — defy the court’s ruling that Willock must foot the bill for a failed injunction he (the Speaker) filed against attorneys with the Commission of Inquiry.

“Sitting on the committee does not mean I support the bill. I do not support defying the court’s orders. The court is one jurisdiction and we must let them do their work,” Vanterpool said.

Premier should have withdrawn 

Vanterpool, who was absent for the entirety of the debate on Fahie’s motion Thursday, said he believed the substantive motion by the Premier should have been withdrawn from the House of Assembly (HOA).

He also noted if he was present for the voting, he would have voted for the motion to be dismissed and supported the counter-motion by the Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, Marlon Penn.

“I think that was a good [counter]-motion [by Penn]. I would support what the Leader of the Opposition presented. I think he presented his case well,” Vanterpool added.

Leave the court’s judgment undisturbed

Penn had countered Premier Fahie’s motion to form the parliamentary committee by stating the decision by the Supreme Court should “stand undisturbed” by the HOA.

In the meantime, the special parliamentary committee will comprise Vanterpool, government legislator Vincent Wheatley, and Opposition legislator for Progressives United (PU), Julian Fraser. The committee will have to make a recommendation to the House within two months.

Shares

Copyright 2024 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

35 Comments

Disclaimer: BVI News and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the comments below or other interaction among the users.

  1. BuzzBvi says:

    Great news. But why he not in the HOA when it mattered? He fought so hard to be there!! At great expense!

    Like 52
    • fed up says:

      They should dock his pay

      Like 20
    • to buzzbvi says:

      he wasnt there because he had done agree to be in the devil committee.

      Like 11
    • well Well says:

      @BuzzBvi
      It was not a hard fight. If Hon Fahie had set up a committee then, the fee of over 200,000.00 would have been the speaker`s bill too.
      By the way, do you realize that the two months for the committee is to wait out the COI and then pay the bill? These guys really playing some serious games in this little secret bvi.

      Like 27
      • Turks says:

        I suspect Willock will have to pay this bill from his personal account. That means the VIP would have to give Willock the money, so he could personally pay the bill as specied by the court.

        The VIP would then be in shark infested waters.

  2. Sally says:

    You should have been in the HOA to state this….

    Like 29
  3. Bumpy says:

    I am happy that Mark is for the rule of law. The Supreme Court’s ruling should stand. When the rule of law is usurped, that is how Dictatorial and Totalitarianism governments are formed. Andrew Fahie wants to be a strong man, like the presidents of North Korea, Turkey or the Philippines. Andrew not in the Virgin Islands. The Virgin Islands is a Democracy, we are a free people and there will be blood before we let you put us in the captivity of Communism. I pray for our children and grandchildren and their children that they will live a quality life in our beautiful Virgin Islands. This is why we stand so strong against your lawless government. Those legislators who support Fahie in his wrong doing should be ashamed of themselves.

    Like 50
    Dislike 1
  4. heckler says:

    1 down 2 more to go

    Like 21
    • Not enough ! says:

      Fraser and Willock are like siamese twins (and go back along way) and Premier knows he has the 2 votes he required before forming this committee.
      Foy thinks we cannot see through his scams !!!!!!!!

      Like 25
  5. yellow on behalf of the NDP says:

    WILLOCK MUST PAY!!!

    Like 39
  6. @ BUZZ says:

    if you are a bee then look for your hive / he didn’t use taxpayers money to pay his bill , if he did , please enlighten us , O THOU ESTEEMED ONE

    Like 1
    Dislike 7
  7. Wonderful! says:

    100% in agreement with Mr. Vanterpool.

    Now, my hunch tells me that Mr. Frazer is a principled man. He has been around for quite some time and knows too well the implications of side stepping the ruling of court.

    I would not be surprised if he comes to a similar conclusion.

    Country over person.

    Like 29
    Dislike 1
  8. leh wilcock tek dat says:

    Every dog has his day

  9. the watcher says:

    two months to decide…..I guess they hoping we all forgot by then….?

    Like 20
  10. JUDGE ITO says:

    CASE CLOSED

  11. if i was he says:

    Julian Frazer should abstain and not try to assist that traitor who left him for the vip candidate Thompson.

    Like 13
    Dislike 1
    • No says:

      He should abstain because a judgement was put out by the High Court. The claimant does not agree and should proceed to the appeal court. If he is so right why don’t he go to the appeals court. If the honourable minister thinking on leading a party and he might have a chance this round then he needs to not support payment or abstain. Let the VIP make its own decision.

  12. rubbish says:

    Mr. Vanterpool does not represent the 4th District. We don’t see him and he does not speak for us in the house. Him and D3 member were wilfully absent from HOA because they were already asked to be members of the committee. You will represent a committee but he can’t represent the people in the house=. Please step down all of you. The majority of us are tired of all this clown show

    Like 26
    Dislike 2
    • bigger picture says:

      If he had openly said he was in disagreement, he would never be on the committee. Mark is a shrewd man. Let’s hope Frazer is as shrewd and that VW man’s up

      Like 10
      Dislike 1
  13. BALLZ says:

    Well what goes around comes around / and the smile the 3rd district gentleman’s face is saying I got U by you by your ( SE*DS) which is of no use to U anyway / but am going to make sure you sing like a canary as you did during the election with all your mud slinging

  14. Hmmm says:

    That is not what was expected of Mark. I am sure that is disappointing news for some.

    Like 1
    Dislike 5
  15. 4th district voter says:

    Thank you Mark. The court has made a ruling. If you disagree,appeal.

    Like 18
  16. lol says:

    Thanks Mark..but where in the world have you been?

    Like 11
  17. Smokey says:

    Just smoke no scrubber and mirrors Shazam! All the rotten eggs in one basket! Got to love it?

  18. Squeaker of the House says:

    So according to this precedent, next time you get a parking ticket you can form your own committee to decide whether you have to pay it? Good to know.

    Like 16
  19. Collusion says:

    Can somebody say Collusion? Sounds like a big scheme to me.

  20. Uncle Tom says:

    1. What is the definition of opposing ?
    .2.Why are you not supporting Marlon’s position?
    3. Where have you been all this time absenting yourself from the HOD ?
    4. Why have you surface at this time to support the Premier options that are now geared to pay Willock debt ?
    5. You are a big disappointment shame on you
    Why are you not supporting Marlon’s decision ?

  21. Yes says:

    Those who tell him to take action should help him pay the fees. We the taxpayer not paying for this.pronto.

    Like 7
    Dislike 1
  22. Cant wait for the COI report.. says:

    Fahie knows that the COI report wont be good for them, he is playing a smart game of trying to get as mich suppost in thr House as he can…He even go as far as bribing them with an increase salary…

  23. Committal says:

    So the 3 person committee has 2 months to make a decision to pay or not. During this time the unpaid lawyers should seek the speaker’s committal at the prison until the court ordered legal costs are paid.

  24. Citizen says:

    The whole notion of the VIP Govt bringing a motion to debate a Court ruling is a violation of the Constitution. And the Yellow media is promoting this as a right, and that the facts need to be known. Bulls….it. it is a violation of the Cinstitution fir the HOA to even consider debating a motion on a Court ruling. This what dictators do. Are we a dictorship, that when the court makes a ruling. Politicians challenge it because they dont like it. We are on a alippery slope BVI. There are no reasons on earth for a govt to justify such actions. If the speaker did not like the ruling the law allows for him to challenge it in court not via the HOA.

  25. lillian says:

    all of the ones was in NDP must pay!!! not only willock

  26. What I say says:

    Mark I like the fact that in words you are supporting the rule of law. Back up your words with action, “Remove yourself from the Committee “.

  27. WHAT U SAY says:

    don’t count / the TRINI hustler done do a number on you and our taxpayers money ? through your over grown EGO and now you want us to pay your bill again , you better go dye your wig

Leave a Comment

Shares