Vanterpool denies sidelining former PS during cruise pier project
Former Works Minister under the previously governing National Democratic Party (NDP) administration, Mark Vanterpool, has denied that anyone was sidelined in his ministry during the cruise pier development project.
Vanterpool made that remark in an appearance before the Commission of Inquiry (COI) yesterday, September 27.
“There is no way that anybody could be sidelined in the project in my ministry that was front and centre; and that was not so,” Vanterpool told the COI yesterday.
But the former minister‘s assertion was in stark contrast to evidence given to the COI by former Permanent Secretary (PS) in his ministry, Arlene Smith-Thompson.
Vanterpool, who declined to be shown evidence the former PS that indicated she was sidelined, told the COI all public officers in his ministry were involved in the project at the time.
Throughout his evidence, the former Works Minister refused to be drawn into any extended arguments, insisting instead that the evidence he had given in writing should suffice for the commission.
Alternate course
Vanterpool told the COI that his NDP government at the time chose to take an alternate course in the project than one that was already selected by the BVI Ports Authority Board. He further said this alternate course was met with some resistance at first.
He insisted, however, that the Board — including its Managing Director at the time, Vincent O’Neal — had received clear direction from him as minister on the course of action that was being taken.
O’Neal, in contrast, testified to the Public Accounts Committee that he had only met with the Vanterpool on one occasion.
The contentious project was deemed to have millions of dollars in cost overruns after an initial estimate pegged it at around fifty million dollars.
But Vanterpool has maintained for years that the project did not have a cost overrun because the $50 million estimate that the government initially gave for the controversial project was an ‘incomplete assessment’.
The final cost for the project was reported to be $82.9 million, which represents more than $30 million above the initial estimate.
Copyright 2024 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.
Mark said he’s not in the mood to answer any questions from the COI. Now you understand why NDP got vote out. His response is a typical NDP member behavior. Rude and disrespectful. That’s exactly what the people were getting. Can’t talk to them at all.
It was not my fault that I overspent by $30+
This is why the BVI has so many problems, we have been stuck between a NDP rock and a VIP hard place. Hopefully to COI will give us a third option
Hopefully not a white UK one, as that will also be intolerably unaceptable.
Some how I believe the PS’s story and not Mark’s own
I hope the UK makes these jokers pay in more than one way.
The COI should first access if 83 million for this project was the actual cost of the project and follow the money. I could care less if Mark if some workers got their feathers ruffled.
Pussers staff money mark .. You in everything
mark should have stayed resigned.
If the same way the UK COI is operating was done to the same UK Government who send them then the UK would be found to be 100 times worse than what they trying to accuse the BVI for.