Bishop Cline hits back at critics who doubt Penn’s leadership
National Democratic Party (NDP) member Bishop John Cline has mounted a strong defence of Opposition Leader Marlon Penn, questioning why Penn’s leadership continues to face public scrutiny while Premier Dr Natalio Wheatley’s leadership attracts less criticism from some quarters.
Speaking during the NDP radio broadcast this week, Cline praised Penn’s years of service in the House of Assembly and argued that his record demonstrates commitment to good governance rather than personal ambition.
“For a man who has served this country… who has championed the cause of the Virgin Islands in the House of Assembly, who is familiar with constitutional and parliamentary procedures… you’re going to tell me people question his ability to lead?” Cline said.
He noted that Penn has remained with the NDP despite opportunities to join the government and secure a ministerial portfolio.
According to Cline, Penn has consistently focused on transparency, accountability and integrity, adding that the Opposition Leader has avoided the personal attacks that often characterise local politics.
Cline contrasted Penn’s leadership with that of Premier Wheatley, whom he accused of lacking transparency and accountability.
“You have a man who came to power by default… avoiding questions, no transparency, no accountability… and you can have a leader as that and question the ability of a man like Marlon Penn,” Cline argued.
His remarks come as Penn has faced periodic criticism over whether his reserved leadership style is enough to lead the NDP into the next general election. However, Cline dismissed the notion that an effective leader must be outspoken or flamboyant.
“He may not be the most vivacious, rambunctious, boisterous person… that does not mean a man can’t lead,” Cline said, pointing to former US President Jimmy Carter as an example of a quiet leader.
In the meantime, NDP candidate Aaron Parillon also defended Penn, describing him as a collaborative leader who empowers those around him rather than seeking the spotlight.
“What makes an exceptional leader is the ability to grow the body around you,” Parillon said. “Marlon listens, he gives positive advice, he encourages you… he keeps you motivated.”
Cline ended his remarks by praising Penn’s personal character and faith: “When we gathered to pray, in our online prayer chat, Marlon Penn isn’t absent. He’s very present. The Bible says righteousness exalts a nation not parties.”
Copyright 2026 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.
But the same Bishop Cline is the biggest critic of Penn’s ability to lead. He has no confidence in Penn’s ability to lead and has been advocating for him to let Ronnie lead instead. So how could he come on live radio and say he has confidence in Penn when he knows that is not true? The public including the same NDP do not have confidence in Penn. Most prefer to take another chance with Wheatley instead.
Thank you Bishop Cline.
Marlon is right for this country. If Sowande can be premier and Screw up things with his “I Made A Mistake” Slogans, Marlon will do a great job being way more experienced in leadership.
You smoking marijuana so early in the morning? You delusional.
John cline knows Marlon is weak and cannot lead he just trying to kiss the ring hoping to get on the ndp ticket set of less man who about self interest
Well he cant be worse than the one we have. Or can he? Im willing to give him a chance.
Anything to get on the at large ticket now. Smh. All about self! He well know Marlon is a waste of time
The mere fact that someone always has to come to the rescue of Hon. Penn speaks volumes! He can never defend himself, what is his record? What has he done? What can he do? Does he have plans? The guy is not leadership material and that is a fact. Nice guy to hang out with, have a drink or two and chat. To lead this Territory? NO!
I understand the case Bishop Cline is making for Marlon Penn. No one can deny that he has experience, has served for years, and has remained committed to public service. But for me, leadership is about more than character, credentials, or good intentions. It’s also about visibility, action, results, and the confidence you inspire in the people you’re asking to follow you.
The reality is that, despite all of Natalio Wheatley’s faults, and there are many legitimate criticisms of his leadership, he is vocal, visible, and willing to put himself at the front of the issues facing the territory. Whether you agree with him or not, people know where he stands because he is visible. Marlon, on the other hand, often appears to be overly reserved and, at times, even disengaged. Fair or not, that perception can easily be interpreted as lazy or lackadaisical, and those aren’t qualities most people associate with strong leadership.
That said, I’m not convinced either man has a record that sets him apart as an exceptional leader. When I look at the districts both of them represent, I don’t see examples of transformational progress. In many ways, those districts feel like areas Columbus discovered centuries ago, still waiting for meaningful development and advancement. So, if we’re judging purely on outcomes, both have failed to establish a clear claim to being the better leader.
But, if I’m being honest, one does stand out more than the other. Not because the results are dramatically different, but because at least one appears to be trying, engaging, speaking up, and putting himself in the arena. Effort without results isn’t enough, but visible effort will almost always resonate more than silence.
But the question shouldn’t be whether Natalio is better than Marlon or whether Marlon is better than Natalio. The Virgin Islands is an established nation with immense potential, and we should stop settling for mediocre leadership altogether. We should be demanding leaders with vision, courage, accountability, energy, and a proven ability to deliver results. Our standards should be higher than choosing the person who appears slightly better than the alternative. We deserve leadership that genuinely moves the country forward, not leadership that simply makes us choose between different shades of underperformance.