BVI News

CARICOM urged to implement better standards for electric vehicles

As electric vehicle (EV) adoption continues to grow across the Caribbean, regional officials are being urged to establish stronger and more harmonised standards for EV charging infrastructure to ensure safety, reliability and interoperability across CARICOM member states.

The call came during a recent CARICOM forum that examined the challenges and opportunities surrounding EV charging systems throughout the region.

Delivering the feature presentation, Director of Ziklag Consulting Group Company Limited, Dr. Soren Maloney, said CARICOM countries are moving at different speeds in developing standards for EV charging infrastructure, creating challenges for regional compatibility.

According to Dr. Maloney, small technical workforces, limited budgets and insufficient regulatory capacity have made it difficult for some countries to establish comprehensive standards. Drawing on Guyana’s experience, Dr. Maloney outlined several measures that countries should adopt when developing EV charging standards.

These include establishing clear rules governing the entire lifecycle of charging facilities, from planning and installation to operation, inspection and eventual decommissioning.

He said countries must determine where charging stations can be located, who is qualified to install them, who will oversee their operation and what safety measures must be in place. Dr. Maloney also stressed the importance of broad stakeholder consultation. He explained that Guyana developed draft standards, circulated them for written feedback, conducted face-to-face consultations and provided training before finalising the framework.

He said capacity-building should be incorporated into the process to ensure regulators, technicians and other stakeholders understand how to implement and enforce the standards effectively.

The consultant further warned against simply copying standards developed in larger countries.

“You can’t cut and paste standards from other regions or countries,” he said, noting that standards must reflect local conditions, market maturity and the scale of EV adoption within individual Caribbean nations.

Dr. Maloney also cautioned against adopting standards that lock countries into a specific technology, arguing that flexibility will be essential as the EV industry continues to evolve. CARICOM officials said harmonised standards would help ensure EV charging systems work seamlessly across member states while supporting the region’s broader transition toward cleaner transportation and energy systems.

Share the news

Copyright 2026 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

6 Comments

Disclaimer: BVI News and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the comments below or other interaction among the users.

  1. I wonder says:

    Is there one on Anegada?

  2. Thomas Edison says:

    In the BVI all electric vehicles must be able to operate without electricity just like all households have to. No reason for them to have power when most of the time I don’t.

    Like 2
    Dislike 1
  3. The electric lie says:

    Before I get a thumbs down, just remember everything comes from something whether drilling for oil or destroying nature for rare earth minerals to manufacture the electric/digital revolution.

    Electric vehicles (EVs) look clean on the surface, like a polished sheet of glass. But underneath that sheen is a system still wrestling with physics, infrastructure, and economics. I’ll strip it down honestly, then set it beside fuel vehicles so the contrast is fair rather than romantic
    The Real Cons of Electric Vehicles

    Battery dependency is the core vulnerability

    EVs are not “fuel independent.” They are mineral dependent.

    Lithium, nickel, cobalt, and graphite are concentrated in limited regions.

    Mining is environmentally disruptive and geopolitically sensitive.

    Supply chains are fragile and price volatile.

    A single battery pack is basically a compressed geopolitical argument on wheels.
    Charging time is still fundamentally slower

    Even with fast charging:

    EV: ~20–40 minutes for a meaningful charge (fast chargers)

    Fuel car: ~3–5 minutes full refill

    That difference sounds small until you’re traveling, working, or stuck in a queue. Time is the invisible tax EVs still pay.

    Charging infrastructure is uneven and inconsistent

    This is one of the biggest real-world pain points.

    Urban areas: decent coverage

    Suburban: patchy

    Rural/highway corridors: unreliable gaps still exist in many regions

    Even when stations exist:

    Some are broken

    Some are occupied

    Some are incompatible or require different apps/networks

    It’s not one unified system like fuel stations. It’s more like fragmented islands of electricity.

    Range anxiety is still psychologically real

    Even if modern EVs can go 250–400+ miles:

    Cold weather reduces range significantly

    Highway speeds drain faster than expected

    Battery degradation reduces range over time

    People don’t just calculate range. They feel it. That uncertainty changes driving behavior.

    Battery degradation and replacement cost

    EV batteries don’t “die suddenly” often, but they do fade.

    Typical degradation: gradual loss over years

    Replacement cost: still very high (though dropping over time)

    Even if rare, the idea of a major future expense sits in the back of ownership psychology like a shadow.

    Grid pressure and hidden emissions
    EVs don’t eliminate emissions. They shift them.
    If electricity comes from coal or gas → emissions are relocated, not erased
    High EV adoption increases grid demand

    Poorly upgraded grids can struggle with peak charging loads

    So the “clean” label depends heavily on how clean the grid actually is.

    Repair complexity and cost

    EVs have fewer moving parts, yes—but:

    Repairs are often specialized

    Battery systems are tightly integrated

    Some damage leads to full module replacement instead of simple fixes

    Independent mechanics often cannot service high-voltage systems easily.

    Charging speed bottlenecks under scale

    A gas station can refuel dozens of cars per hour per pump.

    A fast charger handles far fewer.

    At scale, EV infrastructure requires more space, more grid capacity, more coordination than people initially assume.

    Charging Stations: The Hidden Weak Link

    Charging stations are not just “EV gas pumps.” They are grid-connected digital infrastructure.

    Key problems:

    Reliability issues

    Out-of-service chargers are common in many networks

    Maintenance is inconsistent

    Software/payment failures occur frequently

    Fragmentation

    Multiple networks, apps, and payment systems

    No universal seamless system everywhere
    Queue congestion

    Peak times create bottlenecks

    Unlike fuel stations, dwell time is long, so queues spiral

    Location bias

    Installed where it is profitable, not always where it is needed

    ⛽ Now the Fair Comparison: Fuel Vehicles vs EVs

    ⚖️ Fuel Vehicles (ICE – Internal Combustion Engines)

    Strengths

    Fast refueling (dominant advantage)

    Mature infrastructure globally

    Predictable range and behavior

    Easier repair ecosystem (especially older models)

    Lower upfront cost in many markets

    Weaknesses

    Continuous dependence on oil supply chains

    High emissions (CO₂, NOx, particulates)

    Engine complexity leads to long-term maintenance (oil, transmission, exhaust systems)

    Fuel price volatility tied to global conflict and markets

    ⚡ EVs

    Strengths

    Lower operational emissions (especially on clean grids)

    Fewer mechanical parts → less routine maintenance

    High efficiency (electric motors waste far less energy than combustion engines)

    Quiet operation and smoother torque delivery

    Weaknesses

    Charging time vs fuel time gap

    Infrastructure inconsistency

    Battery cost and mineral dependence

    Grid dependency

    Range variability under real-world conditions

    The Honest Bottom Line

    Fuel cars are logistically mature but environmentally costly.

    Electric cars are environmentally promising but infrastructurally immature.

    Right now, neither is “perfect.” They are two imperfect answers to different parts of the same problem:

    One solves energy storage and convenience brilliantly but pollutes heavily.

    The other reduces tailpipe emissions but shifts pressure to grids, mining, and infrastructure.

    If you strip away marketing language, EVs are not a finished revolution. They are a transition technology—powerful, necessary, but still under construction.

    And fuel vehicles are not obsolete relics yet—they are still the most frictionless long-distance mobility system humans have ever built.

  4. HMM says:

    I t=dont think the Caribbean is ready for electric cars even though they are the future

    • Never says:

      In 1884 English inventor Thomas Parker built the first known electric car. It was supposed to the future then. Whilst we have more efficient methods to move a motor vehicle, EV’s will always be a fad.

  5. Chyyna says:

    Someone wants us to be buying new electric cars.

Leave a Comment