Penn slams gov’t over skyrocketing electricity rates
Opposition Leader Marlon Penn has criticised the government over sharp increases in electricity bills and called for a subsidy to continue until the end of the year.
Penn said some households received August bills that effectively doubled their electricity expenses less than a month after the government removed its subsidy.
“The bills are here. The increases are real. And for many families, they are simply unaffordable,” Penn stated.
The BVI Electricity Corporation (BVIEC) said the higher August bills resulted from record fuel costs in July and were unrelated to the recently approved subsidy adjustment for customers consuming more than 1,500 kilowatt-hours monthly. The corporation plans to apply an undisclosed credit to September bills.
Penn rejected delayed relief and called on the government to make immediate budgetary adjustments.
“You cannot give people a credit for a bill they cannot afford to pay in the first place,” Penn stated. “If the government believes relief is necessary, then adjust the bills now.”
He also urged the government to reconsider removing the subsidy for businesses, arguing that higher operating costs would affect food, services and restaurant prices.
“So while the government may speak about protecting 95 percent of customers, the reality is that electricity costs will ripple throughout the entire economy,” Penn stated.
The government recently changed the subsidy structure so customers continue receiving full assistance on their first 1,500 kilowatt-hours. Customers exceeding that threshold pay the unsubsidised fuel cost on additional consumption. BVIEC said 919 of its 17,068 customers would be directly affected.
Penn called for an independent tariff study to determine the cost of generating and distributing electricity. He also supported an Energy Stabilisation Fund financed through annual budgetary allocations and, where appropriate, an energy levy.
He argued that such a fund could protect consumers when global energy prices rise sharply.
Penn also called for spending cuts and pointed to the government’s reported $2.5 million investment in Delta Capital Partners and $5 million deposit with Bank of Asia as money that could have helped consumers.
“We don’t have a money problem. We have a management problem,” Penn stated.
He said the Opposition would continue pressing for immediate relief, transparency and accountability.
“Government must not balance its books by bankrupting its people,” Penn stated. “The people of the Virgin Islands have carried enough. It is time for the government to carry its share of the burden.”
Copyright 2026 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.
I think part of the problem is how the subsidy was handled. Government was putting $1 million per month into electricity relief for three months, so consumers were partly shielded from how serious the increase in fuel costs really was. Then the relief ended and people suddenly felt the full impact at once. BVIEC has said fuel prices had risen sharply, including a 55% jump in one month earlier this year, so the underlying pressure was already there.
A better approach would have been to gradually reduce the government subsidy each month instead of cutting it off suddenly. That would have allowed households to see their bills increasing little by little and start adjusting their consumption before being hit with a major increase.
The reality is that the world is dealing with conflict and higher fuel costs. When gas and diesel go up at the pump, I adjust by driving less. Electricity should be treated the same way. Maybe we cannot have the A/C and fans running all day, TVs and PS5s constantly on, and water heaters running unnecessarily and expect our consumption habits to remain unchanged while energy costs rise.
It is like moving a fish into water at a different temperature—you gradually acclimatize it instead of shocking it all at once. Government should have gradually reduced the subsidy, allowing consumers to acclimatize to the true cost of electricity and adjust their usage accordingly, rather than shielding everyone for three months and then suddenly exposing them to the full increase.
While I sympathise with families struggling with higher electricity bills, I think the real problem is not the increase itself but how it was introduced. Consumers were insulated from rising fuel costs for several months and then suddenly faced the full impact when the subsidy ended.
The reality is that fuel prices are high everywhere. Across the Caribbean, people are voicing concerns about shocking electricity bills because global factors beyond our control have driven up energy costs, and those increases eventually filter down to consumers. A better approach would have been to phase out the subsidy gradually, giving households time to adjust their budgets and energy use.
A more gradual reduction in the subsidy may not have reduced the cost, but it likely would have reduced the shock.
The basic problem is that BVIEC has relied on the fuel premium for years instead of being realistic about the basic but gradually increasing cost of the actual fuel. Certainly rates would be higher but they will have increased gradually, as have all living costs. Their financial status is not being helped by years of non payment by government and institutions.
It’s funny how small minded people are or just playing politics. Just today it was all over BBC talking about how household energy bills reach a three year high in the UK. The increases wasn’t caused by government mishaps but that’s our problem, people live in a small bubble or just naive. Not everything that go bad is government. They do a lot of stupidness but people act like they trying to kill our babies or something.