BVI News

Proposed $500K fines, prison times too excessive for cybercriminals — Vanterpool

Mark Vanterpool

Opposition lawmaker Mark Vanterpool wants the newly-proposed penalties for cyber-related offences tweaked before the legislation under which it falls — Computer Misuse, and Cyber Crime Amendment Act of 2019 — is passed in the House of Assembly.

The 2019 amendments to the Act is proposing major penalty increases of more than a decade in prison and/or fines of up to half-a-million dollars for cyber offenders.

“I am not saying that they are wrong but when I hear of the $200,000 and $500,000 [fines] and seven years in prison and 14 years in prison, it might be justifiable. But I want to say when we are passing these bills, it sounds good until our cousin, our brother, our friend happens to fall in it,” Vanterpool argued while contributing to the debate on the legislation recently.

“I am suggesting that we take our time through a subcommittee to go through the bill clearly to ensure that we are covering our bases,” he said.

Proposed penalties could work for high-profile cases

The opposition legislator said those types of penalties would be better served for more high profile cases such as incidents like the Panama Papers leak.

And while responding to claims from Premier Andrew Fahie that the proposed fines and terms of imprisonment are meant to deter cyber offenders, Vanterpool said it would be excessive to impose such penalties on a person who sends or forwards an inappropriate message.

“I am not going to accept those sized penalties are just deterrents. We need to be careful because these things are wrong and should not happen. But let’s be careful how we deal with them when they do happen,” he said.

Persons who exploit kids should face stiff penalties

On the other hand, Vanterpool said cases involving the exploitation of children are ‘different altogether’.

“When you are messing with children and not giving them a chance to become an adult, and you interfere with that, I think then that’s a terrible crime. So we need to let people know there’s no joke about that and we need to ensure that when you infringe on that level, you are treading in the wrong direction,” he argued.

The legislator also referred to Jeffrey Epstein, the 66-year-old billionaire and owner of Little St James in the USVI who is accused of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls.

“We need to have penalties that if someone like that was caught here in that kind of crime, then we can exercise some stiff penalties,” Vanterpool said.

Copyright 2019 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

8 Comments

Disclaimer: BVI News and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the comments below or other interaction among the users.

  1. Hmm says:

    What is he saying. If our cousin or brother do the crime let them do the time. We need hard penalties for persons doing crime but let it be for everyone not just for some. The legislators in this country are something else.

    20
    6
  2. 40m over run says:

    He escaped jail time

    18
    5
  3. Sense says:

    Look at how personal the above bloggers got. Is this really necessary? We all play high and mighty until we or someone that is close to us get into trouble. Try having to pay 500k if your child commits a cyber crime. And just so you know, a lot of the things that some of us are doing now on Facebook and WhatsApp will be considered crimes under this new amendment. Start to pay attention and stop talking nonsense all the time people.

    8
    3
    • hmmmmm too.... says:

      @Sense..the idea of the high cost and jail time is to deter the would be law breakers!!! so if the 500K does not deter you then surely you are a real criminal that need to do time and pay the fine.

      4
      3
  4. Wow says:

    This man is guilty of many crimes to be discovered….

    5
    2
  5. crazy says:

    I am all for protecting innocent children and no penalty is too stiff for persons who violate our children.

    However, If a consenting mentally stable adult willingly and knowingly put themselves up for indecent public exposure and start to send naked or unbecoming videos of themselves, why should anyone be fined or charged for sharing it. Wake up! this is the world we live in. Fine the individual for lowering their own standards, not the public.

    We sit and share everybody else’s business but want our dirty laundry to be kept in the dark. The penalty is excessive. Looks like its cheaper when a murder is committed in BVI.

    Everybody behave ayo self.

    Imagine how much of us would be incarcerated if we don’t stop sharing funny videos about trump. He could pass a law to arrest us too and charge us millions in fines.

    1
    1
  6. Anonymous says:

    What does the government no about cyber crimes and I too sure dem in the Complex still using windows XP…

Leave a Comment

Shares