de Castro suggests need for legislative campaign-finance fixes
First-term legislator Sharie de Castro suggested that there is a need for legislative improvements in campaign-financing as well as transparency and accountability in governance.
The legislator made the suggestions while giving evidence before the ongoing Commission of Inquiry (COI) Monday.
She told the COI that, oftentimes, political campaigns are funded at the candidate’s expense and explained that while donors do sometimes come forward, there was generally a mixture of self-funding and donor funding that supported political candidates running for office.
“To my knowledge, just to answer your initial question, there is no law as it pertains to the issue of campaign financing,” de Castro said in response to questions from COI attorney Bilal Rawat.
She further told the COI that with regard to whether House of Assembly (HOA) members received sponsorship, funding was generally requested of legislators by their constituents and not the other way around.
Among the fixes to which de Castro alluded were refinements to legislation that would address issues such as an apparent loophole in the definition of what constituted an ‘immediate family member’. For example, if an HOA member has an adult sibling who has a contract with government, should that member be required to declare that business into the Register of Interest?
The Register of Interests is a record kept of the financial interests of HOA members. Its purpose is to give them the mechanism to publicly declare any private interests which may conflict or may be perceived to conflict with their public duties. Private interests include that of immediate family members such as spouses.
De Castro said in a letter to the COI that she intended to recommend to the HOA that a paragraph on members’ submissions to the Registrar be amended to expressly mention what constituted “immediate family members”.
De Castro told the COI the definition of immediate family members was subject to interpretation by HOA members. She further said there was “absolutely no guidance” as it relates to legislators assisting family members with public funds.
Vote-buying suggested in district allocations
During the hearing, COI attorney Bilal Rawat raised a question of whether there is a possibility that legislators could be viewed as engaging in vote-buying since there did not appear to be significant checks and balances on how electoral district allocations distributed.
This is question was based on de Castro’s statement to the COI that legislators are given $150,000 (less in the case of district representatives) each year for distribution to their constituents. She explained that projects legislators decide to support are at their discretion and are decided based on whether they might be of importance to the community.
She further disclosed that while there is a document that offers guidance on how the allocations are to be distributed, there was no maximum amount stipulated that can be given to any single recipient. Rather, allocations are decided on a needs basis.
Funding, she further explained, was prohibited from being given to immediate family members or House of Assembly staff.
De Castro also told the COI that she was in support of publicising how HOA members spent their allocations since it was public funds that were being used.
Her fellow government member Shereen Flax-Charles also appeared before the COI on Monday and unreservedly said she believed in full transparency of public spending.
Copyright 2024 BVI News, Media Expressions Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.
I was surprisingly impressed by the way she handled herself during the entire process. And that’s coming from someone who hasn’t paid much attention to her in the past.
You did a fantastic job.
Then you have to be a real jack@$$. She was trying her best to sound good….every word for her was subsequently,subsequently,subsequently,subsequently…..geesh!
Every time I hear Rowe open his mouth, I want to pull my hair out. Ugh!!
Kye “S***” Rhymer LMFAO!!! They hit him hard with that blow
YEAH, KYE GOT HIT HARD!!!! I WANT TO SEE HOW HARD THEY ARE GOING TO HIT FRASER AND MITCH.
Vincent here spitting a bunch of p!$$
Vincenttttt!!!!!, VY, VY, VY. LIKE, OKAYYYYY.
Sheereen YES COMMISSIONER Chrlz
Shariee Subsequently DeeKastro
Kie Turtle Ryma
Rowe is a waste of our tax payers money…infact silk legal is.
He and those who hired him are all total waste. I’ve listened to Vincent and Slowryme….the people y all elected are complete jokers
Respect to those two ladies – Thank you.
They handled themselves well. SEE WHY WE NEED A ALL WOMEN CABINET? WOMEN IS THE BACK BONES AND WOMEN GET THINGS DONE.
Sorry! Dislike in error.
Jeez – 150K of public funds given to legislators to buy votes from their constituents. The old white envelopes!!
I am watching Vincent now being questioned and I can’t believe this man was elected to office. SMH
I ALWAYS WONDERED WHERE THE MONEY WAS COMING FROM TO STUFF THE FAMOUS WHITE ENVELOPES. LETS BE REAL GUYS, WE KNOW PEOPLE WHO GOT THE WHITE ENVELOPE FOR THEIR VOTE. SOME TOOK THE ENVELOPE AND STILL DIDNOT VOTE FOR THE PERSON. #VOTESELLING.
Yes, the famous WHITE ENVELOPES.
I guess we will see a poem contest on Governance being announced soon.
YOU CAN GO RIGHT AHEAD ~ YOU GOT THE BLESSINGS OF YOUR OTHER YARD FOWLS ( CANARIES ) BUDDIES
LOL glad I struck a nerve with you hahaha
VW is a waste of time. Apologize for everything. He compared what is happening in the US to a simple question they asked him.
Rowe Is A joke he thinks he can stand head to head with COI, He is a waste of the taxpayer’s money.